Geography And Urben Planning
Khalaf Anafje; Abdolnabi Sharifi
Abstract
The purpose of this study is explain the future studies as a new paradigm in planning in the course of change of urban systems modeling in order to achive ecological sustainability.this fundamental study attempt using the content analysis method and historical methods and data from the study of the library ...
Read More
The purpose of this study is explain the future studies as a new paradigm in planning in the course of change of urban systems modeling in order to achive ecological sustainability.this fundamental study attempt using the content analysis method and historical methods and data from the study of the library resources , investigation the evolution of the application of model and modeling planning and managing urban ecosystems from the past to now , as well as how to inter future studies approach to regional and urban planning system as a largest ecological systems to discuss. The main necessity for attention to ecology is the study of development processes that occur over time through planning and management processes regarding the interaction betwin physical ,material and vital systems in the interior of ecosystems. innovation of this research involves trying to link triple discussions ,future study ,modeling and urban ecological systems in order to formulate the solution to realize future studies approach to management and planning of urban and regional ecosystems today. The results of the research showed that by examining the historical evolution of urban systems modeling, two classical and modern (contemporary) periods can be distinguished under three discourses or cultures of cities.In the contemporary period of modeling or the third discourse, complexity, uncertainty, self-organization and uncertainty of changes caused more attention to the future in modeling.
Geography And Urben Planning
Parviz Soleimani Moghadam; Abdolnabi Sharifi; sadegh allahyari; بافقی زاده Bafghizadeh
Abstract
This research is based on the comparative analysis and ranking of quality of life indicators with an emphasis on the concept of social justice in the neighboring heterogeneous urban areas in Golestan and Cheniba districts of Ahvaz. This article is descriptive and analytical in terms of method and practical ...
Read More
This research is based on the comparative analysis and ranking of quality of life indicators with an emphasis on the concept of social justice in the neighboring heterogeneous urban areas in Golestan and Cheniba districts of Ahvaz. This article is descriptive and analytical in terms of method and practical in terms of purpose. In order to carry out this research, first, indicators related to the concepts of quality of life (social, physical, economic and service) and social justice (educational-cultural, healthcare, administration, policing and leisure time) were extracted and items were defined for each. In the second step, researcher-made questionnaires were designed and 380 samples were distributed among Ahvaz citizens based on Cochran's formula and random sampling method, and the results were extracted. The statistical analysis of the data using independent t-test showed that Golestan region was significantly higher than Chenbiye region in all aspects of quality of life measurement including (social, physical, service and economic). Also, in the examination of various indicators of social justice (educational and cultural, health and therapeutic, administrative-administrative and leisure), Koi Golestan is significantly higher than Cheniba region. In addition, the results of ranking the indicators used in this research using the SAW model showed that the observed differences are mostly in the physical, economic and social dimensions of the chart.
